In defense of passion - an Anti-Thesis of Performance
The DD revelation: Two decades and later
When there was no TV, we yearned
for TV. When we got it, some accepted it with open arms, some fearfully like it
was infringing on their morality / sensibility. Eventually all accepted it, not
to say that the latter were humbled – they were probably right 15 years later
for different reasons.
We were happy with one news
channel for a few years, there were complaints and more complaints about
one-sided news, no views, no choice in channels, boring programmes. The news
readers were seen as static people reading out from a given script. The notion
was DD never excelled because there was no competition. Thus, competition was
brought in. We have seen competition at play for over two decades now.
When media opened up, new news
channels enlivened news, it was views and news. However, to fend for
themselves, they had to be saleable – that meant marketable to advertisers.
They were perceived as being very performance oriented (unlike the government
led channel). They had to report to investors, give them returns, or if not,
atleast outbeat the next best news channels. TRP ratings mattered or most
believed they mattered the most and put it on top of the agenda. It became a performance metric. The
program manager’s goal was to lead his channel to the top of the TRP rating.
At societal level
What this did to the content, the audience, the
messages we wanted to convey – or how was free market & free spirit interpreted
– or was it limited by immediate goals to maximise channel following? Controversy
just enough to raise viewership was welcome. TRP ratings or so called market
forces decided the content – spicy reality shows – with little art or science
as compared to what is available in the country rich as ours in culture. Talent
shows redefined talent as stunt antics, incredible sagas and soap operas. In
Western countries, juggling, doing the unbelievable is talent. In the East, we
have many evolved arts – martial arts, music, dance, sculpture, - why should we
be forced to believe stunts as talent.
Now let us examine what the
pressure of competition and performance does? It brought in efficiency, it
enhanced technology, presentations on news channels improved significantly. But
news remained news and views remained views. Thus, what seems to be the right
thing in the short run, need not necessary give the best variety to a nation in
the long run – am sure this is true for organisations and individual. Quick
performance gratification may be at the cost of true passion callings.
Did this also take away something
from us? May be some tolerance: tolerance of viewing multiple languages in one
channel, tolerance for the non-spicy stuff like Premchand Ki Kahani, tolerance
for well-thought out scripts and stories. Stereo-typed ways to success was the
safest way to reach top the TRP rating chart. Did the customer want that, was
that the passion of the script writer, director or program in-charge. Mere
business considerations “undo” and compromise larger sensibilities.
Did it also dilute the quality of
family discussions? Did the last decade of telecast enhance quality of family
life. A Surabhi or Tana Bana showcased the diversity of this country which a Slap
Stick Comedy show cannot showcase. A healthy debate on key economic issues or
political affairs by people who mattered were commonplace and still commonplace
in DD channels. My Hindi is pretty decent thanks to hearing news readers
reading beautifully in the national news channel.
Take off the investor pressure
May be we need to ask private channel
producers, what is it that they would really like to deliver and do, if
investors / owners needs were taken care of? Probably the “right thing to do”
answers would emerge.
The national time given on media
channels to enhancing / leveraging golden period of India is very low and youth
and children, especially in metros have little to receive besides spice, jazz,
colour and hyper-emotions. I see government channels solely bearing the Cross
of social messages on toilets, primary health care centres, irrigation schemes
and so on.
The
problems of India’s farm sector and allied occupations, on which 60% of world’s
second-most populous nation depends, are rarely the focal point of television
news or debates. A dedicated news channel for farmers – interesting thought
which never occured to many is now reality. No, ou don’t have to watch that
channel. The point is who has the spot on “doing the right thing”.
In a country which can do with so
much communication on schemes, facilities, reaching out, why is it that only
the government news channels actually reach out to the poor. Besides
encouraging candle light marches, and dealing with the urban few, private
channels have much to be desired to be delivered on communication.
Did it give our children “weekly
i.e. short lived” hoeros – based on box office hit item numbers? A singer who
tops the chart today and not there tomorrow. Did it make artistes worry more
about staying in the charts than working on their art?
Which child today can take pride
in seeing award winning films, the national parade on Independence Day,
commentary on leaders of India, history of India, travelogues on India (without
showcasing best hotels and cruises). Today, I can follow a Malayalam film, a
Bengali Film with the same zeal as one in Hindi – it gave me the confidence of
understanding different cultures sitting at home – even if in a limited manner.
That is the power of good media – take us into the different worlds around us.
Have TRP ratings or whatever
measure of success there may be, limited our world to whatever they want to
offer rather than what we could probably be seeing.
To unleash this power, passion is
essential, performance can lag behind – if it is to do the right thing. If you
have a passion , you would have strong beliefs on what you would like to
deliver / perform. It will not be led by misleading metrics like TRP ratings
which can alter the sensibilities of an entire generation.
What do we see in performance and passion led behaviours
Television was an example. One
can extend this to one’s life and see how & when we stop doing the right
things. When all consultants, managers, leaders talk about getting performance
oriented, well may be that is the first step to collective excellence. But
between the first step and the last step in this performance led journey,
passion and good sensibilities are often orphaned cousins.
In building a performance
culture, one tends to rely heavily on defined result areas. To make the
business focused, the targets become the central point. Rewards are largely
related to individual results. Hence, the individual starts focusing on the
goal. Is that not how it should be? So we “do perform” many a times ignoring
what may need obvious attention but focus on stated goals. That is passion
compromised.
If you see it even a few decades
down the history lane, you will realize that some simple things that could have
made a difference just died. What are we killing when we are creating the new –
this awareness is useful to have.
In my view an
unnecessary by-product of getting performance oriented is creating competitive
individuals. Everyone realizes that they need to keep themselves relevant to
the organisation’s need. They align their behaviours and expectations to the
defined performance standards and compete with each other to outperform. Was
this the goal of the organisation? To manage performers becomes the new
necessary evil in a corporate setting.
Whereas, if
there was strong leadership, with a clear message on vision, people would align
their passions together and not just performance. Performance would surely
follow.
If passion is a
more powerful force, your appraisal system cannot capture it – it in fact mutes
it.
I am still
bullish that there are a large number of people who can do the right thing.
It is time to
catch up on DD – “doing the right things”. Quiz time on Sunday mornings versus
KBC kind of show, the Saturday night sports quiz on the DD Tamil channel is powerful
– it is the rural families who are listening to this. Urban youth, beware, are
you truly in touch with reality or happily pandering to instant pleasure and
reassuring yourself listening to 10-sec debates - “Do the right things”.
By
Kanchana Manyam
I am impressed ! Thanks a million for echoing my thoughts.
ReplyDelete1. Only DD seems to have time for classical dance / music programs while NONE of the other channels ever show even a clipping.
2. DD is the only channel that shows sports (old olympic recordings or local sports) while no other channel shows any sports. The only thing others do is hold 'debates', run campaigns as fund raisers and show tonnes of advertisements! So sad and so hypocritical ....
Got your comments - It justs reflects your initials , hence could not figure out earlier. Thanks for your comments!
ReplyDeleteRegards,
Kanchana